Amazon suspends merchant for paying for product reviews

If you’re a seller, Amazon will nail you for posting product reviews of the stuff you’re selling.

One seller, VIP Deals, who was offering rebates in exchange for five-star product reviews, was apparently suspended by Amazon after the New York Times ran a story about them. Not only did Amazon take down VIP’s listings, they wiped out the product page, too.

Just to be clear, we’re talking about product reviews, not merchant feedback.

This is one thing that escapes the attention of many sellers: Amazon’s “prohibited seller activities” includes writing product reviews of items you’re selling. The logic is, if you have a financial interest in the product, it’s too tempting to post an undeservedly glowing review of it (in other words, a “fake” endorsement). Here’s Amazon’s wording:

Creating reviews for items in which you have a financial interest in the product or a directly competing product (for example posting a review of a product you offer for sale on Amazon, or posting a negative review of a competing product) is prohibited. You may not solicit or pay anyone to create a review or offer gifts or refunds for the removal of product reviews.

So, was VIP Deals in the wrong for offering a rebate to buyers in exchange for reviews? No debate in this case. Where they went over the line was in hinting they expected 5-star reviews in exchange for refunds–according to what I’ve read. As the Times recounts, thousands of Amazon customers discovered VIP’s Kindle Fire leather cases priced at $10, marked down from $59.99. The packages arrived with a letter asking buyers “to write a product review for the Amazon community.”

“In return for writing the review, we will refund your order so you will have received the product for free,” the letter said. Here’s a picture of the letter:

There’s nothing inherently wrong about providing free products solely for review consideration. Amazon has a giant program called Amazon Vine, which serves as a pipeline between publishers, product manufacturers, and Amazon’s amateur reviewers. Vine reviewers get a newsletter once a month offering review copies of new books and other products.

You can’t directly sign up for Amazon Vine. It’s one of those “don’t call us, we’ll call you” situations. If you frequently post product reviews on Amazon and get a sufficiently high percentage of “helpful” votes, you’ll get the invitation.

Check out most of the Amazon Vine reviews, and you’ll see that most (but not all) of the reviewers consistently post five-star product reviews. Perhaps they post upbeat reviews because they can expect to receive even more freebies from manufacturers who want reviews of new items.

I’ve heard that it costs publishers more than $5,000 to get a single book included in the Vine program. And so publishers are frustrated when, every once in a while, a Vine reviewer pans a book, according to Publishers Weekly.

One of the most notorious Amazon reviewers is Harriet Klausner, who often posts dozens of glowing book reviews each day of the week.

I’ve been a member of Vine myself for three or four years, and one thing I’ve noticed is that the offered products closely follow your recent purchases. If I’ve recently bought a kitchen gadget on Amazon, the next Vine newsletter will offer kitchen gadgets, in addition to books. Last month I bought a license plate frame on Amazon, and sure enough, today’s newsletter offered auto accessories. So Amazon definitely tries to match up books and products with reviewers who are interested in that category.

How effective is Vine? That’s open to debate. One thing is obvious, though, it’s a cash cow for Amazon — they’ve got manufacturers lining up by the thousands paying big bucks for the privilege of giving away their merchandise, on the theory that they’ll eventually sell more of it.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Q&A: Does long-tail inventory still sell through Amazon’s FBA program?

QUESTION: Are books with high Amazon sales ranks — say, more than 200,000 — still a good bet for Fulfillment by Amazon?

ANSWER: Yes. If you want to sell for the best price you’ve got to ignore the lowballers and use FBA as your edge.

So, I’ll send a book with virtually any sales rank — up to 1 million — to FBA and wait for the sale, even if it’s a valuable book worth $100 to $200 (in those cases I wrap the book within my UPS box to prevent any bumped corners or torn dust jackets at the Amazon fulfillment center).

However, I’ve gotten a lot more conservative about sending bulk inventory to FBA since they implemented the long-term storage fee for items stored longer than 365 days. When they started that policy last year, I had to have more than 1,000 books destroyed I had already shipped to the warehouse or else get socked with a penalty of more than $1,000. Now that hurts — having to destroy inventory you’ve bought and paid for, then paid to ship to Amazon.

Of course the long-term storage storage fee wouldn’t apply to long-tail books you’ve hand-picked at library sales, etc., since the first unit of any ASIN is exempted from the 365-day rule. Yes, my standard practice before they implemented the long-term fee was to send them all as soon as I got them. Now I’ve got to be virtually 100% sure they’ll sell within a year before sending.

You can’t blame Amazon for trying to maximize the turnover at its warehouses, but they should have grandfathered-in those of us who were blindsided with the long-term storage fee last year.

Speaking of the long-term storage fee, it will be decreased effective February 15, 2012, from $45.00 per cubic foot to $22.50 per cubic foot, but will now be charged twice a year instead of once, as previously. More details:

Dear FBA Seller,

Fulfillment by Amazon’s (FBA’s) next inventory cleanup will take place on February 15, 2012. As communicated previously, on that date, and each six months thereafter, FBA will assess an upfront, Long-Term Storage Fee on inventory that has been in our fulfillment centers for 365 days or more.

Please note the following changes to the Long-Term Storage Fee. The fee will be decreased effective February 15, 2012, from $45.00 per cubic foot to $22.50 per cubic foot, but will now be charged twice a year. However, Units that were charged a Long-Term Storage Fee on August 15, 2011, will not be charged a Long-Term Storage Fee on February 15, 2012.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Q&A: Is a reconditioned Zebra label printer worth the money?

QUESTION: I’m trying to grow my business slowly (I have a day job, thank heavens), and I’m considering getting a refurbished Zebra thermal label printer to save ink, paper and time. I see some good deals on Amazon.

Can these printers be used with USPS Shipping Assistant, or would I have to use Endicia or Stamps.com? Is a Zebra printer worth the investment?

ANSWER: I use Endicia with a Zebra printer for 4 x 6 shipping labels. I’ve bought several of them over the years at eBay — new, used, refurbished. They are pretty expensive if brand new — something like $350 or $450 retail. But I’ve never had to pay more than half retail, even for a brand new one. I’ve bought reconditioned 2844s for as low as $40 on eBay.

The one you mentioned on Amazon looks like a decent deal, but you should ask the seller what kind of cable it has. The newer ones have USB cables, which are a heck of a lot easier to plug into your computer and get working — compared to the older cables, which might not be recognized by you computer.

Also, ask the seller if he’s providing the CD that has the printer drivers, just in case your computer doesn’t automatically recognize the label printer. You can download them online after registering with Zebra, but it’s a lot easier if you have the CD with the drivers, and you know they’re the right ones.

Is a Zebra printer worth $200 or $300? Absolutely, as long as you’re printing a dozen labels a day, it’s going to save you a lot of time. I don’t print as many 4 x 6 labels now that I use FBA, but my Zebra printer is still on 24/7. I can’t stand printing 4 x 6 labels through my Dell laser printer.

Using a Zebra printer with USPS Shipping Assistant might give you some trouble, though. I don’t think it would work if you’re printing out just one label, because Shipping Assistant wants to print out mailing instructions along with the label, and it usually takes an 8.5 by 11 sheet. I think it’s the same deal with the USPS Web service, Click n’ Ship. If you’re printing more than one label, I think you can decline to print the instructions. If someone knows more about this, perhaps they’ll chime in.

bookselling

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Can a ‘remainder’ bargain book be sold as ‘New’? Amazon says no, but most say yes

Note from the author:

Be sure to read the comment at the bottom. I certainly agree with points raised there.

QUESTION: This may be more a question of ethics than anything else. I’d like to quote Amazon’s “Guidelines” here and then ask my question:
————————-
New: Just like it sounds. A brand-new, unused, unread copy in perfect condition.

Like New: An apparently unread copy in perfect condition. Dust cover is intact, with no nicks or tears. Spine has no signs of creasing. Pages are clean and are not marred by notes or folds of any kind. Book may contain a remainder mark on an outside edge but this should be noted in listing comments.
————————-

So let’s say you buy 100 books from a wholesaler and it turns out that 60 of them have remainder marks but 40 have no marks at all. From the above guidelines, the 60 with the marks would fall under the “Used: Like New” category. But the 40 without the marks could be listed as “New” right?

I think what I’m asking here is… how does Amazon define the words “brand-new” and “unused”? If a book sits on a Barnes & Noble shelf…. waiting to be sold… and it never happens… does that constitute “used” or something less than “brand-new”???

ANSWER: This has been a gray area as long as I can remember. Some booksellers believe that any book that has been resold (not sold at retail, but simply traded within the book industry) must be described as “Used.” Even if the book has never been touched by human hands since it was taken off the printing press, and has remained in the same carton forever, and is in brand-new, pristine condition without a remainder mark. (Personally, I take the position that a book that appears brand new is, in fact, “New.”)

I do recall that a few years ago Amazon added to their policy on “New” versus “Used, Like New”, indicating that anything with a remainder mark must be sold “Used, Like New,” not “New.” This seemed to clarify things. But 98 percent of sellers handling remainders still list them as “New” even now, and as far as I know, Amazon doesn’t enforce this.

However, since the advent of FBA there’s been a special advantage to listing books as “Like New” instead of “New.” That’s because of the special box that show FBA listings on the main detail page. For instance, there’s a “good” used copy available for this book:

http://www.amazon.com/eBay-Listings-That-Dummies-Computers/dp/0471789127/

From my experience, lots of people will buy that FBA copy in used condition before they’ll buy a cheaper “new” copy simply because the “used” one is the first thing they see, and that’s what some people buy. Some people — millions of buyers — still don’t know how to click through to shop on Amazon’s Marketplace.

Amazon has been doing this for FBA listings for about two years, so they must feel it’s a worthwhile policy.

Yes, most remainders will have a mark, and a certain percentage of people complain about them and leave negative feedback, regardless of whether the remainder mark was disclosed, how it was described, or even whether the book was listed “Used, Like New” or “New.” Remainders are “bargains” and, just like “penny books” they attract more than their share of difficult customers.

You might think that someone getting a like-new book for a ridiculously low price wouldn’t have much to complain about, but they often do. They’ll say the book smells funny. A page was bent. Shipping costs too much. They didn’t like the ending. It never ends…

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Amazon will require ISBNs for books published in 1973 or later

Looks like Amazon is finally cracking down on pollution to its catalog:

Dear Seller,

We are writing to let you know about an upcoming change in the Books category.

In the coming months, ISBNs or EANs (ISBN-13s) will be required when you upload listings for books published in 1973 or later.  Books with a publication date before 1973 will be exempt from the ISBN requirement. To list books published in 1973 or later that do not have an ISBN, you can request an exemption.

This change will improve our ability to match your offer against the appropriate detail page,  minimizing duplicate detail pages and improving the customer buying experience.

*We recommend that you begin gathering ISBN/EAN data for your books and include that data in your inventory file uploads before the change goes into effect in early 2012. You can add ISBN/EAN data to Book Loader files as follows:

- If you use the Standard Book Format , enter your ISBN/EAN in the “product-id” field.
- If you use UIEE files, enter your ISBN/EAN in the “NT” field in the first 200 characters.

For more information about the ISBN exemption request process for Books, please visit the following Help page:

Books ISBN Requirements and Exemptions
http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=200786210

For technical assistance with our volume listing tools, click “Contact Seller Support” from any page in the online seller Help.

Please watch for further details about this change over the coming months.

We know that this change will require extra work on your part and we appreciate your cooperation. We welcome your feedback.

Regards,

The Amazon.com Books team

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments
  • [Google]
  • Archives

  • Meta