The Moment Paul Knew<\/strong> ✨<\/p>If you want to understand Ringo\u2019s value as a drummer, don\u2019t ask a jazz producer who worked with him once on material completely outside his style. Ask the people who made history with him. Ask Paul McCartney.<\/strong><\/p>In 2015, Paul inducted Ringo into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame as a solo artist. During his speech, he told a story about the exact moment he knew Ringo was the perfect drummer for the Beatles. It\u2019s worth quoting in full:<\/p>
\u201cOne night, our drummer then, Pete Best, wasn\u2019t available, so Ringo sat in. I remember the moment. Pete was great and we had a great time with him, but me, John, and George \u2014 God bless \u2018em \u2014 were on the front line singing, which we usually were, and behind us, we had this guy we\u2019d never played with before. And I remember the moment when he started playing, I think it was Ray Charles\u2019 \u2018What\u2019d I Say,\u2019 and most of the drummers couldn\u2019t nail the drum part. It was a little difficult to do, but Ringo nailed it. Ringo nailed it. And I remember the moment, just standing there and looking at John and then looking at George, and the look on our faces was all like \u2018F***. What is this?\u2019 And that was the moment. That was the beginning, really, of the Beatles.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>
This wasn\u2019t nostalgic exaggeration. \u201cWhat\u2019d I Say\u201d has a challenging, cymbal-heavy rhumba-style beat that trips up drummers who lack both technical skill and feel. Ringo didn\u2019t just play it adequately\u2014he nailed it so perfectly that three experienced musicians who had been playing together for years all stopped and looked at each other in amazement.<\/p>
Paul elaborated in the Beatles Anthology: <\/p>
\u201cWe really started to think we needed \u2018the greatest drummer in Liverpool.\u2019 And the greatest drummer in our eyes was a guy, Ringo Starr, who had changed his name before any of us, who had a beard and was grown up and was known to have a Zephyr Zodiac.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>
Notice Paul\u2019s phrasing: \u201cthe greatest drummer in Liverpool.\u201d Not \u201ca drummer who was available.\u201d Not \u201csomeone good enough.\u201d The greatest<\/em>. And this wasn\u2019t just Paul\u2019s opinion\u2014it was the consensus among Liverpool musicians. Ringo had already established himself as the best drummer in the city\u2019s thriving music scene, playing with Rory Storm and the Hurricanes, one of Liverpool\u2019s top bands.<\/p>More recently, Paul told MOJO magazine something even more revealing: \u201cRingo was the perfect drummer for The Beatles. But why? Impossible to say why \u2013 he just was.\u201d<\/p>
That \u201cimpossible to say why\u201d is crucial. Paul, one of the most musically sophisticated popular songwriters of the 20th century, can\u2019t fully articulate what made Ringo perfect for the Beatles. It wasn\u2019t just technical ability\u2014it was something deeper, something about feel, taste, and musical intelligence that defies easy explanation.<\/p>
The Pete Best Problem<\/strong> 🚪<\/p>To understand what Ringo brought to the Beatles, you need to understand who he replaced. Pete Best<\/strong> was the Beatles\u2019 drummer from August 1960 to August 16, 1962\u2014nearly two years of the band\u2019s formative period. He played with them through their grueling Hamburg residencies, where they performed eight-hour sets in seedy German clubs. He was there for the Cavern Club shows that built their Liverpool following. He was handsome, popular with female fans, and by most accounts, a decent guy.<\/p>And John Lennon, Paul McCartney, and George Harrison couldn\u2019t wait to get rid of him.<\/p>
On August 16, 1962, manager Brian Epstein<\/strong> called Best into his office and fired him. Two days later, Ringo Starr played his first official show as a Beatle. The timing was brutal\u2014just as the Beatles were about to sign their first recording contract and release their debut single. Best went from being on the verge of stardom to unemployed in a single conversation.<\/p>Why? The official story involves producer George Martin<\/strong> telling the Beatles after their Parlophone Records audition that he liked what he heard but would use a session drummer for recordings. Martin wasn\u2019t confident in Best\u2019s ability to handle studio work. But this doesn\u2019t fully explain why the Beatles didn\u2019t just use Best for live shows and session drummers for records\u2014they could have, but they chose to fire him completely.<\/p>John Lennon, never one to sugarcoat things, explained it bluntly in a later interview:<\/p>
\u201cBy then we were pretty sick of Pete Best too because he was a lousy drummer, you know? He never improved… We were always gonna dump him when we could find a decent drummer. By the time we\u2019d got back from Germany, we\u2019d trained him to keep a stick going up and down. He couldn\u2019t do much else. He looked nice and the girls liked him so that was all right… but we were always going to dump him when we could find a decent drummer.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>
Paul was more diplomatic but no less clear:<\/p>
\u201cPete had never quite been like the rest of us. We were the wacky trio, and Pete was perhaps a little more sensible; he was slightly different from us; he wasn\u2019t quite as artsy as we were.\u201d<\/p>
George Harrison put it most simply:<\/p>
\u201cPete kept being sick and not showing up for gigs so we would get Ringo to sit in with the band instead, and every time Ringo sat in, it seemed like \u2018this is it.\u2019 Eventually we realized, \u2018We should get Ringo in the band full time.\u2019\u201d<\/p>
The contrast between the Beatles\u2019 assessment of Pete Best and their reaction to Ringo is stark. With Best, they were stuck with a drummer who was adequate for club gigs but couldn\u2019t grow with them musically. With Ringo, they immediately felt something click into place. The rhythm section suddenly worked. The band suddenly felt complete.<\/p>
This matters because it demolishes the \u201cRingo was just lucky\u201d narrative. The Beatles fired their drummer and specifically recruited Ringo away from a more successful band (Rory Storm and the Hurricanes were actually better-known than the Beatles at the time). Ringo was hesitant to join because he had security with the Hurricanes. The Beatles had to convince him. This wasn\u2019t a desperate grab for any available drummer\u2014it was a calculated decision to bring in the best drummer they could get.<\/p>
What the Drummers Say<\/strong> 🎵<\/p>If you want to know whether someone is a good drummer, ask other drummers. The verdict from Ringo\u2019s peers is remarkably consistent and overwhelmingly positive.<\/p>
The Percussive Arts Society\u2014the premier organization for percussion professionals\u2014inducted Ringo into their Hall of Fame. Their statement noted that \u201ccountless drummers\u201d cited the Beatles as inspiring \u201ctheir passion for drums when they first encountered the music of the Beatles.\u201d<\/p>
Drummer Steve Smith provided crucial context for understanding Ringo\u2019s impact:<\/p>
\u201cBefore Ringo, drum stars were measured by their soloing ability and virtuosity. Ringo\u2019s popularity brought forth a new paradigm in how the public saw drummers.\u201d<\/p>
This is profound. Ringo changed what it meant to be a great drummer in popular music. Before him, the standard was Buddy Rich or Gene Krupa\u2014virtuosos who took extended solos and dazzled audiences with technical displays. Ringo established that a great drummer could be measured by how perfectly they served the song, by the taste of their choices, by the feel they created. He made \u201cless is more\u201d not just acceptable but desirable.<\/p>
Gregg Bissonette, another respected drummer, detailed Ringo\u2019s specific innovations:<\/p>
\u201cHe subscribed to the \u2018less is more\u2019 philosophy throughout the verses, and when there was a place for a fill, they said a lot. Like on \u2018Help,\u2019 \u2018Ticket to Ride,\u2019 or \u2018Tell Me Why,\u2019 they were often double stops at very brisk tempos. Ringo was also one of the first drummers I saw to bail on the traditional grip. For years drummers had to play everything traditional grip… Ringo brought the matched grip into the mainstream.\u201d<\/p>
That last point is historically significant. Matched grip\u2014where both hands hold the sticks the same way\u2014is now standard, but in the early 1960s, most drummers still used traditional grip, a holdover from military marching bands. Ringo\u2019s adoption of matched grip influenced countless drummers and became the new standard.<\/p>
Ken Micallef and Donnie Marshall, authors of Classic Rock Drummers<\/em>, wrote: \u201cRingo\u2019s fat tom sounds and delicate cymbal work were imitated by thousands of drummers.\u201d<\/p>Notice what\u2019s being praised here: not technical virtuosity, but sound, feel, and musical choices. Ringo tuned his drums lower than was fashionable, creating a fuller, rounder sound. His cymbal work was subtle and tasteful. His fills were melodic and memorable rather than flashy. He played for the song, not for himself.<\/p>
The Man on the Riser<\/strong> 🎪<\/p>There\u2019s a visual element to Ringo\u2019s impact that\u2019s easy to overlook but symbolically crucial. When the Beatles played large venues during the height of Beatlemania, Ringo wasn\u2019t positioned on the same level as the other three Beatles. He was elevated on a riser, placed high above the stage floor where everyone in the arena could see him.<\/p>
This wasn\u2019t standard practice at the time. Most bands kept their drummers tucked in the back, barely visible behind the frontmen. But the Beatles put Ringo up high, literally elevating him to equal visual prominence with John, Paul, and George. The message was unmistakable: the drummer matters. The drummer is essential. The drummer deserves to be seen.<\/p>
That riser was a physical manifestation of what the Beatles understood musically\u2014that Ringo wasn\u2019t just keeping time in the background, he was a full member of the band whose contribution was worthy of the spotlight. Millions of fans watching the Beatles perform saw Ringo elevated above the stage, and the statement was clear: in this band, the drummer is just as important as anyone else. It was a revolutionary statement that changed how rock bands thought about stage presence and the role of the rhythm section. The Beatles didn\u2019t hide their drummer\u2014they literally put him on a pedestal.<\/p>
The Technical Reality<\/strong> 🔧<\/p>Here\u2019s something that should settle the \u201cwas Ringo technically competent\u201d question: Mark Lewisohn, who documented every Beatles recording session, noted in The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions<\/em> that \u201cthere were fewer than a dozen occasions in the Beatles\u2019 eight-year recording career where session breakdowns were caused by Starr making a mistake, while the vast majority of takes were stopped due to mistakes by the other Beatles.\u201d<\/p>Read that again. In eight years of recording, including increasingly complex songs that pushed studio technology to its limits, Ringo screwed up fewer than twelve times. The Beatles recorded hundreds of songs. They tried multiple takes of almost everything. And the drummer was almost never the problem.<\/p>
This directly contradicts the \u201cRingo couldn\u2019t play\u201d narrative. A technically incompetent drummer would be constantly causing takes to break down, requiring additional attempts, slowing down the recording process. Ringo did the opposite\u2014he was the most reliable Beatle in the studio.<\/p>
Consider what Ringo actually played on Beatles records:<\/p>
\u201cRain\u201d<\/strong> (1966): Ringo\u2019s personal favorite, featuring complex polyrhythms, open hi-hat flourishes, and a groove so perfect that the song was played backward on parts of the recording and still sounds musical.<\/p><\/li>\u201cCome Together\u201d<\/strong> (1969): That iconic opening\u2014a simple hi-hat pattern that creates hypnotic momentum. Any drummer can hit a hi-hat, but creating that specific feel is harder than it sounds.<\/p><\/li>\u201cA Day in the Life\u201d<\/strong> (1967): The orchestral chaos of this song builds to an alarm clock moment where Ringo comes in with fills that are simultaneously bizarre and perfect, matched to the song\u2019s surreal mood.<\/p><\/li>\u201cTomorrow Never Knows\u201d<\/strong> (1966): Ringo\u2019s drumming on this experimental track\u2014heavy, tribal, hypnotic\u2014helped establish the psychedelic sound. It doesn\u2019t sound like anything that came before it.<\/p><\/li>\u201cTicket to Ride\u201d<\/strong> (1965): That drum intro is one of the most recognizable in rock history. Simple, but try playing it with that exact feel and you\u2019ll understand the difference between competence and mastery.<\/p><\/li><\/ul>These aren\u2019t the performances of a mediocre drummer keeping simple time. These are the performances of someone making sophisticated musical choices, creating sounds that hadn\u2019t existed before, serving songs that were pushing the boundaries of what popular music could be.<\/p>
The \u201cNatural Genius\u201d Factor<\/strong> 🌟<\/p>Paul McCartney described Ringo as having \u201cnatural genius,\u201d which might sound like faint praise\u2014the kind of thing you say about someone who can\u2019t read music but has good instincts. But consider what Paul meant in context. Ringo was self-taught. He didn\u2019t have formal training. He couldn\u2019t read music (neither could Paul, John, or George, for that matter). Everything he knew came from listening, feeling, and experimenting.<\/p>
And yet he created drum parts that are still being analyzed and imitated sixty years later.<\/p>
That is<\/em> a form of genius\u2014not the technical genius of a classical virtuoso, but the musical intelligence of someone who instinctively understands what a song needs. Ringo had what drummers call \u201cears\u201d\u2014the ability to hear the whole picture and place himself perfectly within it.<\/p>Ringo himself was remarkably humble about his abilities. He once said his favorite Beatles track was \u201cRain\u201d because \u201cIt\u2019s the first time I think I was playing that \u2018snatch\u2019 hi-hat [\u2019open\u2019 punctuations]. And what helped me to do that was that I was born left-handed. I write right-handed, but if I throw or play cricket or do anything physical, I\u2019m left-handed. So I\u2019m sort of this left-handed guy with a right-handed kit.\u201d<\/p>
This is why Ringo\u2019s fills often moved in unusual directions\u2014he was a left-handed person playing a right-handed setup, creating patterns that felt slightly \u201cwrong\u201d but incredibly distinctive. That\u2019s not a limitation\u2014it\u2019s a signature, a sound no one else could replicate.<\/p>
Serving the Song<\/strong> 🎼<\/p>Perhaps the best defense of Ringo\u2019s drumming comes from an unexpected source\u2014critics who point out that you rarely notice<\/em> Ringo\u2019s drumming on Beatles records. This is framed as criticism: the drumming is so unremarkable it fades into the background.<\/p>But one writer for Varsity<\/em> magazine turned this on its head:<\/p>\u201cWhen I listen to The Beatles, I almost never notice Ringo\u2019s drumming, and that\u2019s a good thing: his drumming never distracts you from the most important part of the song, the singing. In this respect, he is a much better drummer and musician than some more technically proficient than him.\u201d<\/p>
This is the essence of Ringo\u2019s genius. The Beatles were a songwriting band, not a jamming band. The vocals and melodies were paramount. Ringo understood that his job was to create a foundation that made everything else shine. He could have played flashier. He could have taken more solos. He could have demanded more space in the mix. Instead, he played exactly what each song needed and nothing more.<\/p>
Consider what would have happened if the Beatles had recruited a technically superior drummer who wanted to show off their chops. The songs would have been worse. The balance would have been wrong. The Beatles worked because every member understood their role, and Ringo\u2019s role was to be the heartbeat\u2014steady, reliable, perfect, but never the focal point.<\/p>
That\u2019s not a limitation. That\u2019s wisdom.<\/p>
The Verdict<\/strong> ⚖️<\/p>So is Ringo Starr a good drummer? The question itself is flawed. Ringo wasn\u2019t just \u201cgood\u201d\u2014he was the perfect drummer for the most important band in rock history, and his influence fundamentally changed how drummers thought about their role in popular music.<\/p>
Could he play complex jazz charts? Apparently not, if the Quincy Jones story is accurate. Would he win a drum-off against Neil Peart or John Bonham? Almost certainly not. Was he the most technically proficient drummer working in the 1960s? Definitely not.<\/p>
But ask any of the thousands of drummers who cite Ringo as their inspiration. Ask Paul McCartney, who knew instantly that Ringo transformed the Beatles. Ask professional drummers who inducted him into the Hall of Fame. Ask anyone who\u2019s tried to play \u201cCome Together\u201d or \u201cA Day in the Life\u201d and discovered that what sounds simple is actually fiendishly difficult to get right<\/em>.<\/p>Ringo Starr was exactly as good as he needed to be for the music he was making. He served the songs with taste, intelligence, and creativity. He innovated in ways both technical (matched grip, drum tuning) and musical (redefining what great rock drumming could be). He was reliable, professional, and musically intelligent enough to play on songs that ranged from \u201cI Want to Hold Your Hand\u201d to \u201cTomorrow Never Knows\u201d without ever being the weak link.<\/p>
The fact that we\u2019re still arguing about this sixty years later\u2014that the Quincy Jones anecdote matters enough to discuss, that people feel compelled to defend or attack Ringo\u2019s abilities\u2014is itself proof of his significance. Nobody argues about whether mediocre musicians were any good. We argue about Ringo precisely because he mattered, because the Beatles mattered, because what he did continues to influence how we think about rhythm in popular music.<\/p>
Was Ringo even the best drummer in the Beatles? Well, he was the only drummer in the Beatles when it counted, and that band changed the world. That seems like answer enough. 🥁✌️<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
From \u201cnot even the best drummer in the Beatles\u201d to Hall of Fame innovator\u2014separating myth from reality about the man who kept the beat for the Fab Four 🎸<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"amazonpipp_noncename":"","amazon-product-isactive":"","amazon-product-single-asin":"","amazon-product-content-location":"","amazon-product-content-hook-override":"","amazon-product-excerpt-hook-override":"","amazon-product-singular-only":"","amazon-product-amazon-desc":"","amazon-product-show-gallery":"","amazon-product-show-features":"","amazon-product-newwindow":"","amazon-product-show-list-price":"","amazon-product-show-used-price":"","amazon-product-show-saved-amt":"","amazon-product-timestamp":"","amazon-product-new-title":"","amazon-product-use-cartURL":"","amazon_featured_post_meta_key":"","_amazon_featured_alt":"","amazon-product-template":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[33,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2x2Mt-c6zsI","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178882320"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178882320"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178882320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":194564311,"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178882320\/revisions\/194564311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178882320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178882320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weberbooks.com\/kindle\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178882320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"Buy](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com\/public\/images\/8e36b4b5-7f7e-4960-9a84-b1a285e1f599_493x500.jpeg?w=640&ssl=1\")
<\/figure>